Good

If goodness is subjective, then goodness is dependent on the person.
There could be no goodness without people.
Saving humanity from destruction is saving goodness from destruction.

There CAN be objective truth without objective goodness, though.
But that doesn’t make objective truth objectively good.
The truth is often unpleasant, and one’s concept of goodness may hinge on what is pleasant.

However, learning the truth is the best strategy for saving humanity from destruction.
Any argument to the contrary would have to be both LEARNED and TRUE in order to be valid.

If your concept of good does not include maintaining the conditions for maintaining goodness, then your goodness is not sustainable and should rightfully die off.

I believe this is the closest one can rationally come to objective good:
To love the world. To give and receive the truth. To save the world. To protect the people.

The Gth Dimension

I was talking to a friend of mine about the complexity of potential for higher dimensional beings doing God-like things.Such a being would be SO complex… more complex than anything we can wrap out minds around.If life on Earth is too complex to have come about on its own, then how the hell could this even more complex God-being come on its own?Maybe he’s the completeness of evolution. The only thing that could have survived the death and rebirth of universes.

Maybe he’s evolved to be that great?
How many billions of years does one universe live?
Times that by billions, and imagine a creature that’s been surving, adapting and reproducing during the whole process.

Enter the present day…